Seções: Índice Geral
Seção Atual: Índice Obra: Índice
Anterior Seguinte
(p. 113)
5. THE PHYSIOLOGY OF VEGETARIANISM (1)
I
shall put before you, principally, the scientific
aspects of the question. First, I will speak of the misunderstanding under which
we Vegetarians lie. Only two days ago I took up a popular society paper in which
Vegetarians were spoken of as "poor, crazy creatures flying in the face of
nature." Another writer spoke of us, in the Times, as "poor weaklings." I don't think that phrase
exactly applicable to us or our history, either past, present, or future as
Vegetarians. As there is a great deal of misapprehension about, let me point out
a few facts about Vegetarianism scientifically considered. Some have the idea
that we would send out men to graze like Nebuchadnezzar. They never seem to have
heard of the class of animals called "frugivorous." They can never have read Huxley, or the works
of the great anatomists and physiologists. They have never followed the
arguments on the doctrine of evolution. I won't say if I am an evolutionist or
not. On one point there is no doubt whatever: if we study the anatomy of man, we
find it is just the same as that of the higher apes; both are anatomically and
physiologically the same. This is a little against our pride, perhaps, to think
that we only belong to the family of apes; but I am not speaking of their moral
qualities. If you go into a dissecting room and see an ape on one table and a
human creature on another, you have a great deal of difficulty in seeing the
difference between them, especially if the skin has been stripped off. The teeth
of man are precisely the same as the teeth of the ape. We hear a great deal from
people, who don't understand it, about the canine teeth. These, they say, are
flesh-tearing teeth. They
(p. 114)
are
nothing of the sort. The cuspid teeth of the ape are
for the purpose of defence and of cracking nuts, and
certainly under no circumstances for eating beefsteaks or mutton chops. A grown
man has thirty-two teeth, if he has them all, wisdom teeth included. There are
apes of the
(p. 115)
the
vegetable kingdom. We will glance at the approximate value of these foods, and
see how very much richer the vegetable kingdom is. We hear it said: "If you want
to build up muscle and tissue and so on, you must go to the animal kingdom for
it. If you wish to be strong you must consume nitrogenous matter contained in
flesh-meat." Now, pork and ham contain 8 %, lean beef and mutton 18 % of
nitrogenous matter; flesh-meats thus contain from 8 to 18 %. If you get your
nitrogen from the vegetable kingdom, you will find it much cheaper. You get from
25 to 30 % of nitrogenous matter out of lentils, pease, beans, and all kinds of cereals. With regard to the
carbonaceous foods, we get all we need from the vegetable kingdom. And the oils
too are far more cleanly when obtained from the vegetable than from the animal
kingdom. This is clear to the meanest capacity, and I do not dwell upon the
point. Again, animals are liable to many diseases. All the worm diseases proceed
from eating animal food, and the poor get the worst kinds of meat; that is, they
are obliged to get the intestines, the lights and liver, precisely those parts
where the germs of disease abound. These germs of disease are not to be seen by
the naked eye, but as soon as they get into the human frame they develop slowly
and surely. In the intestinal canal, perhaps, there is a tiny speck, hardly to
be seen by the aid of the microscope. Yet this may develop into a worm four or
five feet long. Nor is that the only animal disease. Another disease, well known
to butchers, is "pearl" disease, which is a form of tubercular disease. We heard
the other day of butcher's meat being 80 to 90 % diseased. We even can give for
this the authority of Dr. Alfred Carpenter, speaking before the Medical Congress
of 1881; so we may take it for granted it is true, yet it seems almost
incredible, that from 80 to 90 % of butcher's meat should be unfit for food. Put
it down at a lower figure, and you may say that 60 to 70 % is diseased. This is
frightful when you come to think of it. From the worm diseases the vegetable
kingdom is absolutely free. Men may, of course, get unsound vegetables, but they
are easily seen to be not good, and we do not eat them. Meat, however, deceives
us; it may look perfectly well, and we may not be aware of disease in it, but it
may contain the very germs I mentioned just now. Now, about one of the "strong"
arguments our opponents adduce. They say if we did not kill animals we
(p. 116)
should
have our fields and back gardens swarming with cattle! It is amusing that people
do not stop for a moment to see what this means. Is it not perfectly well known
that we breed animals to kill? They say if we do not destroy the bullocks and
other animals we shall have sheep and oxen running all about the streets. We
should be eaten out of house and home by cows. We should soon see if they were
indigenous to this country, were all the people Vegetarians. The fact is that
the land which ought to be the people’s
is given to the beasts. In this
(p. 117)
Well, I went into the
country and ate porridge and fruit, and appear to-day on this platform! Then,
again, there is the Leather Question. I was determined that on this point I
would not have my boots thrown at my head as a reproach; so I went about London
to find a man who would make boots without leather, and I found him, and have
the boots on this evening. The argument about leather then is answered, for
soles, uppers, and everything else are made without it.
Two years ago I climbed the hills of
(p. 118)
do
so as regards intellect also. With regard to the moral point of view, we have a
tower of strength, and can easily prove we are not "poor weaklings." I think on
every point we can prove our strength, and, let me say it with all modesty, our
superiority also. We are superior to animals of prey, and we rise above them. We
don't want to drag ourselves down to the level of the tiger, but we rather rise
above it. Our motto is "Upwards and onwards!" We should strive to teach men to
live simply and purely, and we should reduce our own wants as much as we can. We
should assimilate ourselves more and more to the teaching of those men who have
been pioneers of the cause. Let us adopt the teaching of Pythagoras – "Learn to
love that which is right, and custom will make it pleasant and delightful." I
will close my remarks by quoting two verses of a little poem (1)
of Goldsmith, which perhaps you have heard. They appear to place our doctrine in
a beautiful light, so I don't think I can do better than quote them to you. They
are very simple, yet they are very expressive. They are:
"No flocks that range the valley free
To slaughter I condemn;
Taught by the Power that pities me,
I learn to pity them.
But from the mountain's grassy side
A guiltless feast I bring;
A scrip with fruit and corn supplied,
And water from the spring."
FOOTNOTES
(113:1) From the Report of
the Address given by Anna Kingsford on 12th January 1885 at Exeter Hall, London,
at the close of the International Health Exhibition, under the auspices of the
Manchester Vegetarian Society. It is one of many addresses that were, on that
occasion, given by prominent vegetarians; it is taken from the Report of the
Exeter Hall Meeting that was issued by the above-mentioned society (see Biographical Preface, p. 52 ante).
(118:1) In The
Vicar of
Seções: Índice Geral Seção Atual: Índice Obra: Índice Anterior
Seguinte: