Índice Geral das Seções
Índice da Seção Atual
Índice da Obra
Previous: XLVI - Concerning
Consciousness and Memory in Relation to Personality Next: XLVIII - Concerning The Christian Mysteries
Nº. XLVII
CONCERNING THE SUBSTANTIAL EGO AS THE TRUE SUBJECT (1)
IT HATH been said, “All life is a burning,” and thou sayest, “Let the cells of the brain be likened to these burning logs, and their ash to waste tissue, and the flame to consciousness. Then is consciousness nothing more than an unstable product, which, when the logs are all consumed, dieth away with their ash. How then shall we think of Psyche, if she be this flame? Is not all consciousness phenomenon merely, depending for its existence on an organic process; a consensus of vital action in the nervous cells? And the Psyche, what is she but the sum of conscious states, – a complexity, unstable and automatic, making and unmaking herself at each instant, even as the flame?”
What, then, doth cognise these
unstable states? These successive and ephemeral objective conditions to what
Subject do they manifest themselves, and how are they recognised? If
consciousness be phenomenon, to what noumenon is it
related?
Perceivest thou not that the flame, which is
phenomenon, appeareth not to itself, and dependeth for its objectivity on the subjectivity of the
observer? The physiologist who
telleth
thee that memory is a biological processus, and that
consciousness is a state dependent on the duration and intensity of molecular
nervous vibration, toucheth not the Psyche. For this
molecular phenomenon is incapable of cognising itself; it is objective only.
Seest thou not that unless there be an inner, subjective ego to perceive and to reflect in
itself this succession of phenomenal states, the condition of personality would
be impossible? Or, thinkest thou that unless in the
true and inner universe the ideal flame subsisted, thou couldst cognise the
material flame? Knowest thou not that in the Divine
Mind subsist eternally and substantially all those things of which thou beholdest the images and phenomena? It is this inner
substantial
noumenon which is the Psyche. And as in nature there
are infinite gradations from simple to complex, and
from coarse to fine, so is Psyche reached by innumerable degrees, and they who
have not penetrated to the inner, stop short at the secondary consciousness,
which is objective only, and imagine that the subjective, which alone explains
all, is undemonstrable. But only Psyche can apprehend
the psychical; only reason can reach the ultimate. “By what, or by whom,” say
the biologists, “are these ephemeral and unstable states which they name
consciousness, apprehended? Dependent for their production upon duration and
intensity of vibration, they pass away as quickly as they appear.” If, then,
they appear, it is to something, otherwise
their production and apparition, automatic in itself, could not be cognised. A
thing or a state doth not appear to itself, but to the observer. For apparition
and production are processes affecting a Subject, and this Subject is Psyche.
But the vice of your biologists lieth in their pursuit of the unity in the simple rather
than in the complex. By this method they reverse and invert the divine method of
evolution, and nullify its end. They refuse unity to the man, in order to claim
it for the molecule. For the ultimate element, indivisible and indestructible by
thought, for the simplest and lowest monad only, they claim unity, and thereby
individuality. Thus they divinise the lowest, and in their method evolution hath
no motive or reasonable end.
But, in truth, Psyche is the most
complex of essences, and of this complexity is born responsibility. Pure and
naked simplicity
of being is the outermost and lowermost, touching negation. And the dignity and excellence of the human soul lieth not in her simplicity, but in her complexity. She is the summit of evolution, and all generation works in order to produce her. The philosophy then, which deifies (1) the lowest in place of the highest, ignores the true sense of its own doctrine of evolution. For the occult law which governs evolution brings together, in increasingly complex and manifold entities, innumerable unities, in order that these units may, of their substantial essence, polarise one complex essence; – complex, because evolved from, and by the concurrence of, many simple monads; – essence, because in its nature indivisible and indestructible. The problem of the Ego in man is the problem of God in nature. By the same method which expounds the last, shall the first be expounded likewise. The human ego is, therefore, the synthesis, the divine impersonal personified. And the higher and more excellent this personality, the profounder the consciousness of the impersonal. The divine personality is not concrete, but abstract, and the divine consciousness is not objective, but subjective. The phenomenal personality and consciousness are to the noumenal as water reflecting the heavens, the nether completing and returning to the upper its own concrete reflex.
If thou desirest
really to study, to comprehend, and to master the heavenly science, thou must
learn that interior and subjective method by which only heavenly things are
apprehended. Thou must shift the ground of thine
observation from the exterior to the interior; and this can be accomplished only
by means of regeneration. “I tell thee that unless thou be born again, thou shalt not see
the
It is necessary before entering on
the study of the substantial, that thou shouldst
clearly apprehend what difference there is
between the abstract and the concrete. Now
the study of the material is the study of the objective, and that of the
substantial is the study of the subjective. That, then, which the biologists
term the subjective is not truly so, but only the last or interior phases and
conditions of phenomena. Thus, for example, the unstable states which constitute
consciousness, are in their view subjective states. But they are
objective to the true subject, which is Psyche, because they are perceived by
this latter, and whatever is perceived is objective. There are in the microcosm
two functions, – that of the revealer, and that of the entity to which revelation is
made. The unstable states of the biologist, which accompany certain operations
of organic force, are so many modes whereby exterior things are revealed to the
interior subject. They are not in themselves the subject to which the revelation
is made.
Do not think that thou canst attain the subjective by the same method of study
which discovers to thee the objective. The last is found by observation from
without; the first by intuition from within. The human kosmos
is a complexity of many principles, each having its own mode of operation. And
it is, therefore, on the rank and order of the principle affected by any special
operation that dependeth
the nature of the effect produced. When, therefore, for example, the biologist speaketh of “unconscious cerebration,” he should ask himself
to whom or to what such operation is unconscious, knowing that in all vital
processes there is infinite gradation. Questions of duration affect the mind;
questions of intensity affect the Psyche. All processes which occur in the
objective are relative to something; there is but one thing
absolute, and that is the Subject. Unconscious cerebration is, therefore, only
relatively unconscious in regard to that mode of perception which is conditioned
in and by duration. But inasmuch as any such process of cerebration is intense,
it is perceived by that perceptive centre which is conditioned by intensity, and
in relation to that centre it is not unconscious. The interior man
knoweth all processes, but many processes are not apprehended by the
mental man. This truth ought in itself to demonstrate to thee the distinction of
the human principles, and their separability
even on this plane of life. If, then, the mundane ego and the heavenly ego be so
distinct and separable, even when vitally connected, that a nervous process
conscious to the latter shall be unconscious to the former, how much more shall
separability be possible when the vital bond is
broken? If the polarities of all thy kosmos were
single and identical in direction, thou wouldst be
conscious of all processes, and nothing would
be to thee unknown, because thy central point of perception would be precisely
the focus of all convergent radii. But no unregenerate man is in such case. For
most, the perceptive point lies in the relative and objective man, and by no
means in the absolute and subjective. Thus the convergent radii pass unheeded of
their consciousness, because, as yet, they know not their own spirit. They are
asleep while they live, and incapable of absolute cognition.
Footnotes
(116:1)
(118:1) In the original it was written “defies” – which was very likely a typographical error.
(118:2) Received at the same time and in the
same manner as the foregoing, but written down on the following day. E.M.
Índice Geral das Seções
Índice da Seção Atual
Índice da Obra
Previous: XLVI - Concerning
Consciousness and Memory in Relation to Personality Next: XLVIII - Concerning The Christian Mysteries