Índice Geral das Seções   Índice da Seção Atual   Índice da Obra Atual   Anterior: Lesson ll   Seguinte: Lesson IV

 

 

(p. 34)

LESSON III

 

THE DIVINITY OF CHRIST, THE ONLY BEGOTTEN SON OF GOD –

THE ESSENTIAL AND THE HISTORICAL CHRIST CONTRASTED

 

            IF OUR conceptions of the Christ do not harmonize with the theological opinions of any persons who peruse this volume, they will please to remember that we do not consider the holding of our views upon the divinity of Christ as necessary to anyone’s salvation, and therefore if you entertain views different from ours, according to the spiritual philosophy we are endeavoring to inculcate, you stand as good a chance of salvation, both in this world and in that which is to come, as though your views were precisely the same as ours. Now, belief rests upon evidence; no intelligent person can believe anything without sufficient evidence. If you believe in the presence of any material object it is because you rely upon the evidence of your bodily senses; and before you believe in the truth of any doctrine, it must be submitted to your intellect for consideration. Spiritual truth appeals to your conscience or moral sense and thus summons as its witness the divinest element of your being. When conclusions are arrived at by any speaker, writer, philosopher, or school of thought which are at variance with truth as it appeals to your individual

(p. 35)

mind, you are not only not bound to agree with such teaching, but you are bound in duty, reason, and justice to disagree; we may, however, agree to disagree, or, more properly, to differ. Now, we regard all phases of human thought and feeling as natural expressions of human intelligence, and as doctrines concerning Deity, the divinity of Christ, the personality of the Holy Spirit, trinity in unity and unity in trinity, besides other kindred theological themes, too numerous to mention, may be justly catalogued among the most difficult problems which can be presented to the human mind for solution, the wonder is rather that there are comparatively so few differences in the world, than that there are so many; the wonder is that there are so few sects in Christendom rather than that there are so many; for though there are perhaps three hundred distinct Christian sects, the majority of the sects are, broadly speaking, orthodox, as they agree to accept the divinity of Jesus, and the Trinity or tri-personality of God, even though all contend also for the divine unity.

 

            Universalists, and particularly Unitarians, have departed from the orthodox standard of Christendom by positively affirming that Jesus, though possibly superior to all other men, was still only a man, and though the son of God, in the sense of being peculiarly divine through the nobility and purity of his nature, is not God the Son. If you are acquainted with church history you are well aware that Servetus was put to death at the instigation of Calvin, because he would not acknowledge the incarnation of God in Jesus and persisted that Jesus was only the son of God while Calvin insisted that Jesus was God the Son; when

(p. 36)

preparation was complete for the burning of that noble martyr, Calvin stood ready to doom his soul and body to everlasting flames because of this difference in theological opinion. The friends who gathered around Servetus urged him to confess that Jesus was God the Son, but he consistently prayed, “Jesus, thou son of the living God, have mercy upon me.” That prayer, he knew, would not suffice, to save him from a terrible martyrdom; he must say “Jesus, thou Son of the living God,” no longer, but “Jesus, the living God,” or there could be no salvation for him, either in this world or any other. He expired refusing to comply, and thus allowed himself to be offered as a holocaust to theological intolerance.

 

            Now, as the doctrine of the absolute deity of Jesus is entirely distinct from the simple doctrine of his divinity, many people declare their belief in the divinity of mankind, in the divinity of natural law, and yet do not mean that they believe in the deity of man or of natural law; the word divine does not necessarily mean deific, “deific,” being a very much higher word in theological parlance than “divine.” The divine soul in man is shared by all humanity, almost all philosophers believe in a divine human soul. Esoteric Buddhists call it Atma, and designate it the seventh principle. The divine soul is superior to the spiritual soul, and again the human soul is superior to the animal soul, in Buddhistic theosophy. In the first chapter of the fourth Gospel, we are introduced to a learned dissertation upon the Logos or divine Word; the Gnostics of the early Christian Church declared the Logos to be the indwelling word, revealing the will or law of God in

(p. 37)

every human heart. Now it is quite possible to interpret the divine sonship of Jesus in such a light as to include the divine sonship of all humanity. And while departing from the ordinary theological standards and rejecting the canons of interpretation which are regarded as alone sound in the orthodox Christian world, we may profitably interpret the Gospel of John as a spiritual disquisition concerning the spiritual nature of the universe and man, rather than as a historical narrative. Let us remove this subject entirely out of that petty, arbitrary and quarrelsome realm, to which, unfortunately, it is so often degraded, and from the noble height of spiritual contemplation see Jesus standing before us not as a mythical personage, or a solar myth, nor as a man mysteriously endowed with a nature foreign to that of all other human beings, but as one who has run the race which we are now engaged in running, won the prize for which we are now fighting, already wearing the crown which shall forever rest upon the brow of each of you when you have accomplished your spiritual warfare as he long ago accomplished his.

 

            Jesus in history represents whoever has overcome the world; he says to his disciples, “Be of good cheer, I have overcome the world.” If he has overcome the world you also will overcome, because he has overcome it; because he lives you will live also; because he has entered into the heavens you will also enter into them; because he has ascended to his Father, who is also your Father, therefore you will also ascend.

 

            Thus in the true light in which the New Testament story presents Jesus to mankind, he does not sand to us in the relation of an incarnate deity, a super angelic

(p. 38)

personage, or one belonging to a divine order of beings altogether separated from humanity, but he appears simply in the light of one who has graduated with the highest honors from the school of earthly discipline, one who has learned every lesson that can be learned on this planet, one who has completed the circle of embodiments on tins orb, one who has passed beyond the need of further discipline, and has therefore entered that realm of absolute spiritual being which is the true home of every soul.

 

            Now, many say, is it not strange that out of the records of past history you should be able to gather sufficient materials for an ideal character? Is not our ideal in the future rather than in the past? Is not the glorious Eden-time in advance instead of in the rear? Is it not true that to-morrow will surpass to-day in spiritual advancement? Is not to-day in advance of yesterday? In affirming that one who lived 1,800 or 1,900 years ago had already attained to spiritual perfection, are you not denying evolution, which demonstrates an incessant improvement of species and progress of mankind?

 

            We answer, we are not denying advancement in any sense; but the progress of universal mankind has certainly been indicated or outlined by the special attainments of exceptional Messiahs or Avatars who have blessed the world in ancient days, souls who have periodically visited like spiritual comets different nations of earth, wandering like spiritual stars over the spiritual firmament of many climes, in many ages, prophesying of universal human attainment.

 

            Occasionally upon the tree of human life a fruit has

(p. 39)

appeared fully ripened; that thoroughly ripened specimen has been gathered into the celestial kingdom; the remainder of the fruit is yet green. Here and there in life’s harvest field a golden sheaf has fully ripened, and that sheaf has been gathered in. These ripened sheaves are first fruits, which have already been waved in the temple as an earnest of the abundant harvests which are to follow.

 

            Jesus attained to perfection; he expired physically upon the cross with the words upon his lips, “It is finished;” and you realize that the majority of human beings pass away with the thought in their minds, “my work is unfinished,” they feeling almost invariably that there is much work for them still to do, and if they could only live their life over they could improve that life in every respect. A great deal of the fear of death, of reluctance or unwillingness to take the step into the unseen state is occasioned by a feeling that earthly tasks are not finished, duties appear unfulfilled, conquests yet need to be won, many talents have not been utilized. In contrast to all this, can you not imagine something of the glory of a soul that can pass front earth exclaiming, “My work is finished?” Not finished for eternity, but finished for time; not finished with regard to all the blazing worlds in space, but finished with regard to this planet; not finished in regard to my total spiritual mission, which will occupy me throughout eternity, but perfectly finished with regard to this planet. Jesus is reported to have said, “For a certain cause came I into the world.” He declared he could not leave the world until this work was done. He stands before us all in history as a perfect representation of human perfection.

 

(p. 40)

            You who have studied The Light of Asia as interpreted to English speaking readers by Edwin Arnold in his charming poem bearing this title, or “the Great Renunciation,” will remember that Buddha attained to Nirvana, or the state of absolute spiritual blessedness (perfect oneness with Deity) before he quitted the material forth. This leads us to ask, Is it not possible in this earthly school that once in a while a scholar should graduate with highest possible honors? That once in a while we should behold a foregleam of the utmost possibilities of humanity? Is it not possible that here and there some great and regal spirit should appear before you and willingly take upon himself all material discipline in order that humanity may be uplifted, and then discover at last that there is no vicarious atonement in the orthodox sense of the term, but that every one who willingly lays down his life for another’s good lays it down for himself as well as for others? The greatest difficulty which has ever beset theological controversialists is the difficulty of vicarious suffering. Now we all see that there is much vicarious suffering in the world. Manny suffer for the good of others. Martyrs have been put to death and many future generations have been benefited by their martyrdom. Warriors and soldiers have willingly shed the last drop of their life blood for their countrymen, and their patriotism has been rewarded in the salvation of the nation for which they died. But if you follow such into spiritual life you will find that no deed of heroism, no act of patriotism, no willingness to suffer for the sake of humanity has ever left the sufferers unrewarded. Each soul has suffered for its own advancement,

(p. 41)

even though unacknowledged, as well as for others; and in enduring suffering with no thought of self, heroes have reached the sublimest heights of unselfishness and are thereby placed above all need for further encounter with difficulty for the last demon you have to conquer is selfishness; the last enemy you must put under your feet is the devil of personal pride and human ambition; the last sin that is finally dislodged from the human breast is the love of one’s self more than one’s neighbor. When divine love for humanity is fully manifest in my individual, when any are willing to lay down their life for the world regardless of consequences to themselves, not looking for happiness hereafter or thinking anything about reward, but only desiring to work for humanity, demanding no recompense, doing good for the love of it – when any soul reaches such a point in its advancement, we care not whether the man or woman is an avowed atheist or theist, whether the mind is spiritualistic or materialistic in its external proclivities, we care not whether such are members of any church or advocates of any religious system they may worship in a cathedral or in the open air, or they may not recognize that there is an need for outward worship in the universe; we care not whether such individuals sat on thrones on earth or begged bread from door to door, in such do we behold a true manifestation of divine life.

 

            True spirituality is not a question of head, brain or intellect, neither is it one of theology, or of belief in a life to come. It is altogether a question of being so truly imbued with divine life that you love a million of your neighbors a million times better than you love yourself.

(p. 42)

If you love each of your neighbors as well as you love yourself, you must love two neighbors twice as well as yourself, and the great bulk of humanity as many times better than you love yourself, as the mass contains more units than one.

 

            As the bulk of humanity is composed of units, each one must be as valuable as yourself in the sight of the Eternal and you are not established fully in truth till you look at humanity from the divine standpoint.

 

            There is certainly in history an ideal life, and we do not hesitate to affirm that no one could ever have written the life of a nobler man than ever lived, for had there been no materials to furnish the story there could have been no record. You can not portray a character nobler than your own conception of it. You can not paint a picture beyond your highest conception of art. You can not compose music transcending your highest genius. If there is a lack anywhere it is always in the outward form, for this can not surpass what is in the author’s mind. The author’s mind is, however, frequently above the book he writes. Therefore if an author presents you with a hero who dazzles you by the splendor of his soul, that hero whose life is written is not so great a hero as the hero who was an actual reality to the author. If anyone sings a song ever so divinely, that song is not so divine in its rendition as it is in the spirit that is beyond all outward interpretation.

 

            So, when, after reading a life of Buddha or of Jesus the Christ, you have asked, “But did such a man as Buddha ever exist? Was there ever anyone on earth so good as he? Anyone who voluntarily gave up all the

(p. 43)

splendors of an empire to identify himself with suffering humanity? Was there ever anyone so pure as Jesus of Nazareth?”

 

            The answer is emphatically yes. The theory that Jesus is a solar myth and the twelve apostles twelve signs of the zodiac, is utterly inadequate to account for the moral and spiritual side of the narrative as all reasonable people must be well aware. We admit that in ancient days the sun was the chosen symbol of divine life and light; but when the Egyptians paid adoration to the god of day they did not according to esoteric teachings, bow before the material orb we call the sun, but before the mighty angel Osiris, who dwelt in the sun. And when they turned their eyes in worship to Alcyone the center of the Pleiades they declared that central orb in the universe to be the abode of the highest intelligence which could be made manifest to human comprehension.

 

            Solar worship was not idolatry, not materialism, but sprang from recognition of every world in space being the result of spiritual laws and operations. When you turn your eyes to the spheres above you, contemplate the stars, and strive to number the constellated worlds shining in the midnight heavens, each star a sun blazing forth in glory with planets and satellites revolving around it in the depths of space, remember that this is not the only inhabited world; we are not the only conscious intelligent beings looking out upon the glorious night. Every star and every sun is, was, or will be inhabited, every satellite bears some form of life, and according to the grandeur of the sun, the majesty of the planet, or the development of the satellite is the developed life thereon.

 

(p. 44)

            When the old system of solar worship, which a large number of people are to-day bringing forward as proof that there was no personal Christ, no personal Buddha, no personal Osiris, no living Messiahs and Avatars in ancient days is understood and interpreted in the light of the spirit, it will be found to mean next to nothing of what it is supposed to mean by the school of Dupuis and others who declare it to be nothing beyond external worship of celestial orbs. Every world is a manifestation of mind. In a higher stage of the world’s development men will be able to navigate the air, and eventually on wings of spirit to pass from planet to planet. Observatories will some day be erected upon earth’s hilltops, and there, by means of powerful instruments of observation, entirely unknown to you and impossible in your present state of development, you will behold the condition of other worlds and know absolutely of this earth’s relation to other realms in space; you will at length perceive those who at the close of any cycle have passed on (numbering 144,000, in mystical Apocalyptic numeration), have passed from the earth to the next planet. It is to the planet Mars that you must turn to day for illumination from those who have graduated from the earth and have passed to comparatively celestial states.

 

            We introduce these remarks into this lesson because of the opportunity they afford for reconciling what a great many people imagine to be irreconcilable statements concerning the rise and fall of nations. We tell you the very ground upon which you now tread was once occupied by intellectual giants in comparison to which you are pigmies; that the civilization of pre-historic

(p. 45)

California was far beyond its civilization to-day, and that when through natural changes wrought by upheavals on the Pacific Slope, ancient centers of civilization were entombed, the immortalized inhabitants having developed out of material conditions passed on to the next planet, and now shine down upon you from the sphere of Mars.

 

            Whenever one cycle of advancement is completed anywhere a new era commences. The future of this world will witness the absolute spiritualization of the entire earth. The future golden age will include in its blessings every human being. The culminations of the most exalted prophesy, will be seen in the perfection of the entire planet and all upon it. In the past, here and there, there have been seen expressions of what the World and humanity will at length attain to, and these expressions have been the essential Christ within humanity revealing itself externally. Many persons constantly use the word God in reading the Bible as though there were only one original equivalent for God, whereas every one who can interpret Scripture with the light thrown upon it by an accurate knowledge of Hebrew, understands that the word God is used in three if not more senses. You are told that no man hath seen God at any tine. God in this place means the Eternal One, the Infinite Being who is utterly invisible and beyond all outward recognition. You are told in the first and second commandments of the decalogue that there is no form known to man which may be termed the form of God, you conclude then, God is not in human form, because if God were in human form then the form of God would be known. God the

(p. 46)

Eternal, self-existent Being has never been seen by man, the form of God is not known. Madam Blavatsky in her Isis Unveiled comes much nearer to a correct interpretation of the highest thought concerning Deity than do those whose theology is portrayed by Gustave Doré in his celebrated picture of the Trinity, which represents God as an older man, a younger man and a dove. The older man is called the Father, the younger man the Son, and the dove the Holy Spirit. In an eternal trinity there can be no senior and junior persons, but there can be an older and a newer manifestation of God; thus in a secondary sense a conception of God in human form is not inaccurate as the Infinite Being is revealed to man through humanity and can be revealed in no other manner.

 

            In an inferior sense the word God has been used to signify a mighty angel, the ruler of the planet. Therefore though God the Eternal has never been seen by man, the representative or messenger of Deity, the special angel who reveals God to the world has been seen. In a third and yet lower sense of the word God, you read in the New Testament that they were called gods upon whom the spirit of God came; in ancient days they were also called sons of God and sons of God were often called gods. In early chapters of the Bible you are told that sons of God inter-married with daughters of men. Who were these sons of God? They were members of those ancient orders at the head of which stood the order of Melchisidec, sons of light, or sons of the sun, they were called in ancient Egypt. Now if those peculiarly endowed and highly privileged persons inter-married with earthly women, not for the

(p. 47)

purpose of spiritually refining them but for purposes of material gratification, those who belonged to the higher orders in spirit degraded themselves without elevating those with whom they became united. The fallen angels of theology are only those who were appointed to a higher mission, but fell through false ambition, while the unfallen are those commissioned with a divine and glorious authority who have been faithful to their trust and never diverged in the slightest degree from that high and holy mission appointed them.

 

            Two Adams appear in the Bible – a first Adam and a second Adam. One Adam is of the earth earthy, the Adam who fell is called the first Adam, while the Adam who restored the loss caused by the fall of the first is called in the New Testament the second Adam. Christ is called the second Adam, but Christ esoterically means the higher principle in man which redeems the lower. Now the Adam of early days interpreted spiritually signifies the human soul in its primal innocence, but the soul in a condition of ignorance, not yet having encountered the trials and temptations of earth. This state may be termed celestial infancy, spiritual babyhood; and is like to a child reclining upon the mother’s breast, pure and spotless. You call it an immaculate little darling, not knowing the difference between right and wrong, or good and evil, but while you cannot attribute sin to the child, still do you wish your child to remain a child forever? The child must grow up to man’s or woman’s estate, must go out into the world and encounter every form of temptation, for it is temptation that tries the power of the spirit. Therefore when upon the heights of Calvary, Jesus with triumph

(p. 48)

exclaims, “It is finished,” and he is identified with the second Adam, he represents the soul that has finished its earthly course, having put matter with all its temptations forever beneath his feet. The soul which has vanquished every earthly trial and arisen victorious on the wings of spiritual effort and self sacrifice is above the need of painful discipline forever after.

 

            The Christ of history and theology is more than the personal Jesus, being the representative of idealized and glorified humanity. What Jesus has already become you will all in future ages attain unto.

 

            The divine Logos or Word is “The light that enlighteneth every man that cometh into the world,” and is therefore not a person but the spiritual principle in humanity which personality must at length make manifest.

 

            Now, if the divine Word were confined to the personal Jesus, how could it illumine every man that cometh into the world? If salvation depended upon knowledge of a personal Christ, since Jesus was on earth but thirty-three years at one period in the world’s history, it would be utterly impossible for hundreds of millions of human beings to be saved, because they could have no opportunity of knowing that such a person as Jesus ever lived. Bishop Thomas, an eminent Methodist, has declared that he does not believe in the necessary damnation of the heathen, and says he could not carry any Christianity to the heathen if he felt that Christianity compelled him to teach such an infamous doctrine as the damnation of the heathen, who had no opportunity to be saved. This view may be regarded as representative

(p. 49)

of all enlightened Christian teaching, which is to the effect that only willful rejection of truth is an unpardonable offense.

 

            But if belief in an individual Christ is not necessary to the redemption of the world, if heathens mid Jews can be saved as well as Christians, if Mohammedans and Buddhists can go into the Kingdom of Heaven together, then what is essential to salvation?

 

            The essential Christ is the divine life within you, your own divine soul, which is the candle of the Lord burning upon the candlestick of your moral nature; and, as salvation does not depend upon belief in historical records, neither upon trust in a person, it does depend upon following this divine light. And, as salvation depends entirely upon following the divine light, you can readily understand how Jesus taught a gospel totally distinct from that gospel in which his name has been disfigured instead of glorified by popular Christianity. Jesus said. Many shall say to him at the judgment, “Lord, Lord,” who will not enter into the kingdom of heaven.

 

            The only passport into the Kingdom of Heaven is the passport of charity, morality and justice expressed by ministering to one’s fellow beings. Surely an Atheist can feed the hungry, clothe the naked, give consolation to the sick and distressed and visit those in prison. Does not Jesus say those who have done these things shall be upon the right hand, those who have not shall be upon the left.

 

            The way of salvation laid down by the gospel proves that a true following of Christ signifies becoming imbued

(p. 50)

with the spirit of truth in love. It is utterly apart from theological controversy, and depends solely on following the divine voice within the soul.

 

            We declare there is no one upon earth who has not the divine candle within; no one who has not heard the voice of the true Christ; no one who has not been appealed to by the angel side of his own nature; no one who is not invited to become a member of the body of Christ. When Paul said there are many members but one body, and even so is the Christ, did he not say that the Christ was the compact body, the spiritual organization of true, tried and faithful souls?

 

            Jesus may have represented the head to Paul, Buddha representing the head to many Asiatics; Osiris may have represented the head to the ancient Egyptians in some older dispensation scarcely known to history; other lights whose names are unrecorded may have represented the Christ to those who lived in pre-historic antiquity; still the Christ ever represents the sphere of perfected souls, and the light shines down from the celestial heavens pulsing ever earthward until it reaches to the outermost boundaries of human perception. The Christ of antiquity, the spiritually endowed, the truth-bringer, the truth-teller is not confined to person or to age but is the one divine life made manifest to all humanity.

 

            We do not urge upon any one to accept a historical manifestation of Christ if they have difficulty in doing so on account of the paucity of evidence. No one should be required to accept anything as spiritual truth which his own soul is not capable of discovering for itself, External authority must be displaced in favor of interior conviction.

 

(p. 51)

            We are often asked concerning the position of Jesus in the spiritual world. We state that it has been given to earth on the testimony of the most exalted intelligences who have ever communicated with man, that Jesus occupies, as an individual soul, a place of peculiar exaltation in the spiritual heavens overshadowing the earth. If many do not know of Jesus in spirit life, they are simply in ignorance concerning him. But we would urge upon you all when dealing with communications of a negative character, no matter where they come from, to remember that negative testimony is not accepted in any court of law, only affirmative testimony is considered of value. If one honorable, upright person whose word need not be doubted, goes into court and states that he knows such and such a thing to be true, the testimony of that one person is considered of infinitely more value than the negative utterance of a million persons, who know nothing whatever of the matter under consideration, If one person, whose veracity is unquestioned positively affirms anything, his testimony is accepted and from it jury and judge alike consider and decide. So it is ever with regard to spiritual truth and the higher aspects of spiritual teaching; not what the majority do not know, but what the minority know and are able to impart intelligently is the measure of spiritual truth favorably considered by an intelligent community.

 

            We have encountered many – yes, we say “many” advisedly – who have absolute knowledge that Jesus now exists in the spiritual world and that he  is an exalted being, We can not then be so foolish as to say that he does not exist, which would be equivalent to putting

(p. 52)

out our own spiritual eyes because somebody else can not see, or destroying our own spiritual ears because some body else can not hear.

 

            True charity demands no false compromises. We cannot depend for evidence upon what is not known or not revealed; but all should be ever on the alert at all times and everywhere to receive the very utmost that can be received from the spiritual heavens within and without man on earth.

 

            The gospel of Jesus stands, however, without reference to his personality as the very highest truth ever embodied in literature. We can surely all maintain that if we live in accordance with that gospel, obey those precepts, and conduct commercial transactions in harmony with the Golden Rule, the world will soon become a paradise. We would rejoice to see merchants put it to the test, and then give an opinion. The trouble between labor and capital is all because the Golden Rule is not obeyed. There can be no settlement in case of strikes and other labor agitation favorable to both sides and to all humanity until the Golden Rule solves the problem of labor and its relation to capital.

 

            The deepest significance of the Golden Rule is, that you feel toward others as you would have others feel toward you, but there are unfortunately a large number of people who are willing to let their religion lie in the realm of sentiment without putting it into practice such people will readily say, “Oh, yes, you should feel kindly toward everyone,” but while they accept truth, theoretically, they are not willing to translate it into action. Jesus found this condition among the people whom he distinctly taught that sentiment was not sufficient,

(p. 53)

religion must be taken out of the realm of sentiment and become a part of every-day life, the highest spiritual convictions are useless until practiced. Jesus practically interpreted convictions in this life, and thus earned immortal qualities.

 

            Because Jesus is the son of God is no proof that others are not sons of God. Because light shone in Palestine 2,000 years ago is no proof that there can not be a spiritual revelation in this day or in future times.

 

            We maintain that the teachings attributed to Jesus are intrinsically valuable. We do not care whether they were uttered by him in Palestine 2,000 years ago or in an ante-deluvian country 20,000 years ago. If the teachings now on record are put in practice the world will be saved and redeemed, and if those teachings are not practiced all the belief in the world, all the baptism in the world, all the reception of sacraments, all the preaching possible will fail to redeem humanity. You must eat and drink spiritual truth. You must eat the flesh and drink the blood – that is, your daily life must become one with that spirit of truth which was made specially manifest in the higher teachers of humanity.

 

            Jesus as an historical personage we decidedly believe in as one who lived in harmony with the highest law; and the same highest law is now in existence – the law of love. The highest teachings now given to the world, are in response to human needs. Let there be no hostility between Jew and gentile; no dispute as to whether Moses or Jesus are personages, the teaching is true in principle, in spirit it is now here and can stand upon its merit. Whatever has demerit must fall, because

(p. 54)

of inherent imperfection and from no other cause. Carping critics who can not interpret the beauty and sublimity of the gospel would pick flaws in the character of an angel far more quickly than in an ordinary mortal, because angelical dispositions are not so much in harmony with their affections. Every one admires most whatever is most in accord with his own standard of excellence; and as every one has a standard of his own you must perceive the highest standard in order to truly admire the highest teachings. Therefore it is a compliment to Jesus, to the gospel and to all highest expressions of spiritual truth when sensual people throw dust and discredit upon them. Was there ever a martyr or reformer, man or woman, who stood above the age, who was not persecuted by those who could not comprehend them? They who have lived in advance of their time have ever been termed in league with Satan. Because Jesus proclaimed the higher truth he was said to be under the influence of Beelzebub, the prince of Devils. Later on Galileo and Copernicus were called fools and fanatics, so with all great reformers and inventors; until the world has grown up to their plane of thought it reviles them. Spiritual truths are often under a ban, but truth must conquer, and that perfect light which is in each one, the ideal life will eventually include in its embrace the entire family of man. Then will the great body of the Christ be revealed. Then will all be one in spirit and at length visibly constitute one great united family.

 

            Personalities will no longer be objects of worship, but the perfection of spirit made manifest through all mankind will constitute the perfect coming of the Christ in the ultimation of God’s kingdom upon earth.

 

 

Índice Geral das Seções   Índice da Seção Atual   Índice da Obra Atual   Anterior: Lesson ll   Seguinte: Lesson IV